Economic Losses Estimation due to Rejection of Indonesian Exported Food

Winiati P Rahayu, Citra Prasetyawati, Yuanita Arizona, Wibisono Adhi

Abstract


Export rejection has become an issue of concern for both exporting and importing countries. Rejection of food exports that occur directly or indirectly resulted in losses experienced by many parties. The purposes of this research were to identify the factors that play a role in the calculation of the estimated economic losses due to the rejection of export food and estimated the value of the economic losses. The commodities studied were tuna, shrimp, and nutmeg. While the export destination studied were the United States, the European Union, and Japan. The method used in this research was survey and descriptive analysis. The calculation of the estimated economic losses was done by using the equation obtained from the result of a literature study and data collection. Components that contribute to the calculation of estimated losses due to a rejection of Indonesian exports consist of the loss of sales and related activities on communication, testing and retesting, transportation and execution. The highest economic losses based on data from the three years (2014-2016) was on tuna that was estimated at US$3.01 million per year by the rejection from the United States. The transportation cost contributed to the highest loses as much as 59% or US$2.4 million per year.


Keywords


economic losses; export; food safety; food rejection; Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baylis, K., Martens, A., & Nogueira, L. (2009). What drives import refusals?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(5), 1477-1483.

[BPOM] Badan Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan. 2017. Sarasehan: Keamanan Pangan Pada Produk UMKM. Jakarta (ID): BPOM RI.

[BPOM] Badan Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan. 2020. Surat keterangan ekspor pangan. Jakarta (ID): BPOM RI.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2017. Buletin Statistik Perdagangan Luar Negeri- Ekspor Menurut Kelompok Komoditi dan Negara. Jakarta (ID): BPS RI.

[CEA] California Environmental Associates. 2016. Indonesia Fisheries: 2015 Review. Prepared for The David and Lucile Packard Foundation. San Francisco: CEA.

[EURASF]. European Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed. 2017. Notification List [Internet] [20 April 2017]. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/rasff-window/portal/?event=notificationsList&StartRow=101

[GMA] Grocery Manufacturers Association. 2011. Capturing Recall Costs-Measuring Recovering the Losses. Arlington: The Consumer Brands Association.

Govindaraj, S., Jaggi, B., & Lin, B. (2004). Market overreaction to product recall revisited—The case of Firestone Tires and the Ford Explorer. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 23(1), 31-54.

[Kemendag] Kementerian Perdagangan. 2017. Market Brief-Peluang Usaha Produk Buah Pala (HS 0908) di Italia. Jakarta: Kemendag RI.

[MHLW] Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. 2017. Imported Foods Inspection Services [Internet]. [10 April 2017]. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/topics/importedfoods/index.html

Nurani, T. W., Murdaniel, R. P., & Harahap, M. H. (2013). Upaya Penanganan Mutu Ikan Tuna Segar Hasil Tangkapan Kapal Tuna Longline Untuk Tujuan Ekspor (Fresh Tuna Handling Quality for Tuna Longliner Caching for Export Market). Marine Fisheries: Journal of Marine Fisheries Technology and Management, 4(2), 153-162.

Putro, S. (2008). Peran Mutu Dalam Menunjang Ekspor Udang Nasional. Squalen Bulletin of Marine and Fisheries Postharvest and Biotechnology, 3(1), 1-6.

Rahmawaty, L., Rahayu, W.P. and Kusumaningrum, H.D., 2014. Pengembangan strategi keamanan produk perikanan untuk ekspor ke Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Standardisasi, 16(2), pp.95-102.

Resende-Filho, M. A., & Buhr, B. L. (2007). Economics of traceability for mitigation of food recall costs. Available at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/3650/.

Rinto, R. (2011). Kajian Penolakan Ekspor Produk Perikanan Indonesia Ke Amerika Serikat. Prosiding Inovasi Teknologi Pengolahan Produk dan Bioteknologi Kelautan dan Perikanan III, 87-90.

UNIDO. 2011. What Does Border Rejection Tell Us About Trade Standard Compliance in Developing Countries? Analysis of EU and US 2002-2008. Vienna (AU): UNIDO.

UNIDO. 2013. Analysis of Rejection of Asian Agri-food Export to Global Markets. Vienna (AU): UNIDO.

[US OASIS] American Operational and Administrative System for Import Support. 2017. Import Rejection Report. [Internet]. [15 April 2017]. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/importrefusals/




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25292/j.mtl.v7i1.368

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Winiati P Rahayu, Citra Prasetyawati, Yuanita Arizona, Wibisono Adhi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

JURNAL MANAJEMEN TRANSPORTASI & LOGISTIK | ISSN : 2442-3149 (Online) | ISSN : 2355-472X (Print)

 Creative Commons Licence
Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats