Penunjukan Vendor Prioritas Dalam Penyediaan Karton Dangerous Goods Untuk Proses Re-Packing

Authors

  • Adik Moechlis Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti
  • Lira Agusinta Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti
  • Nofrisel Nofrisel Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti
  • Edi Abdurachman Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti
  • Dian Artanti Arubusman Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54324/j.mtl.v10i1.1090

Keywords:

dangerous good management, vendor assessment, repacking handling, logistics

Abstract

The objective of this research is to determine the priority suppliers in the repackaging division. The main problem is that there are no results of the assessment of the existing criteria, namely one criterion with other criteria is considered to be superior in selecting a vendor. This study uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process analysis tool. The results of this assessment are the supplier's performance to the company using the AHP method based on the right criteria, namely, Dynastyindo with very good results and World Expert with quite good results. The Dynastyndo vendor is classified as very good for March 2021, while the World Expert vendor can improve its performance further. The key findings are, the criteria that are considered most important at this time are price and both services. So that these two things can be focused which can then be seen in terms of which sub-criteria or indicators need to be repaired from vendors who have problems.Policy recommendations as a follow-up to research that still has limitations, it is necessary to carry out actual vendor assessments for all vendors that work with PT. DG Pack Wahana Multi Logsitk using actual data from the current month.

References

Apriyaningsih, A. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor Project Menerapkan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). TIN: Terapan Informatika Nusantara, 2(9), 542-550. TIN: Terapan Informatika Nusantara, 2(9), 542-550.

Astanti, R. D., Daryanto, Y., & Dewa, P. K. (2022). Low-carbon supply chain model under a vendor-managed inventory partnership and carbon cap-and-trade policy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 30.

Gharaei, A., Karimi, M., & Hoseini Shekarabi, S. A. (2023). Vendor-managed inventory for joint replenishment planning in the integrated qualitative supply chains: Generalised benders decomposition under separability approach. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 10(1), 1962428.

Habeahan, I. R. (2022). Sistem Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor Pada PT. Putra Rimba Nusantara Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Media Aplikom, 14(2), 100-127.

Handoko, A. M. (2015). Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach on Consumer Preference of Toyota Agya, Daihatsu Ayla, Honda Brio in Manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, 3(3).

Indrajit, R. E., & Djokopranoto, R. (2003). Manajemen Persediaan, Barang Umum dan Suku Cadang Untuk Pemeliharaan dan Operasi. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Keshavarz-Ghorbani, F., & Pasandideh, S. H. R. (2021). Optimizing a two-level closed-loop supply chain under the vendor managed inventory contract and learning: Fibonacci, GA, IWO, MFO algorithms. Neural Computing and Applications, 33, 9425-9450.

Mao, A., Yu, T., Ding, Z., Fang, S., Guo, J., & Sheng, Q. (2022). Optimal scheduling for seaport integrated energy system considering flexible berth allocation. Applied Energy, 308, 118386.

Nguyen, N. A. T., Wang, C. N., Dang, L. T. H., Dang, L. T. T., & Dang, T. T. (2022). Selection of cold chain logistics service providers based on a grey AHP and grey COPRAS framework: a case study in Vietnam. Axioms, 11(4), 154.

Nuraini, R., Alamsyah, D., Septarini, R. S., & Sinlae, A. A. J. (2022). Completion of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using the Weighted Product Method on the Server Maintenance Vendor Selection System. Jurnal Teknik Informatika CIT Medicom, 14(1), 27-35.

Nurhasanah, N., & Tamam, M. A. (2013). Analisis pemilihan supplier untuk pemesanan bahan baku yang optimal menggunakan metode AHP dan Fuzzy AHP: Studi kasus di PT XYZ. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 3(3).

Peng, J. (2012). Selection of logistics outsourcing service suppliers based on AHP. Energy Procedia. Energy Procedia, 17, 595-601.

Pramukti, Y. A., & Andryana, S. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Metode AHP dan Metode MFEP Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor. Jurnal Media Informatikan Budidarma, 6(4), 2014-2021.

Prihartono, Y., & Magdalena, H. (2016). Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) Sebagai Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Internet Service Provider Terbaik di Pangkalpinang. Sisfokom, 05, 21–32.

Saputra, S., & Putri, M. K. (2022). Membangun Kepercayaan Pelanggan Terhadap Layanan Pos Express dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pada Kantor Pos Bandung. Pro Mark, 12(1).

Stevenson, J. . W. (2002). Operation Management. NewYork: McGrawHill.

Tu, L., Lv, Y., Zhang, Y., & Cao, X. (2021). Logistics service provider selection decision making for healthcare industry based on a novel weighted density-based hierarchical clustering. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 48, 101301.

UmaDevi, K., Elango, C., & Rajesh, R. (2012). Vendor selection using AHP. Procedia Engineering, 38, 1946-1949.

Wang, C. N., Nguyen, N. A. T., Dang, T. T., & Lu, C. M. (2021). A compromised decision-making approach to third-party logistics selection in sustainable supply chain using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy VIKOR methods. Mathematics, 9(8), 886.

Wardana, N., & Nurhayati, E. (2022). Analisis Bullwhip Effect Menggunakan Vendor Managed Inventory di Umkm Marrone. Jurnal Teknologi Technoscientia, 14(2), 97-107.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-16

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023): Maret

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).