RISK MANAGEMENT IN CONTAINER TERMINAL IN PORT OF TANJUNG PRIOK

Authors

  • David Pandopotan Sirait Kuhne Logistic University, Germany
  • Maria Besiou Kuhne Logistic University, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54324/j.mtl.v4i3.186

Keywords:

business continuity management, business continuity plan, container terminal, enterprise risk management

Abstract

Container Terminal Operations is one of the core business of PT Tanjung Priok Port, the purpose of this study is to identify operational risks container service activities in Tanjung Priok and formulate mitigation efforts in order to ensure the sustainability of its business. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) has a relationship that is important in the practice of Business Continuity Management (BCM). Risk identification and treatment in general have been mapped in the ERM practices are organized in order to support the achievement of corporate goals. ERM identify, analyze, and manage enterprise risks in general, where it is a first step in making the concept of BCM.The method used is a qualitative and quantitative analysis through the process of Risk Control Self Assessment and Business Impact Analysis. The respondent were General Manager and all staff in PT Tanjung Priok Port. The result showed that there are two significant risks in container terminal is a risk that is not a reliable IT systems and labor strikes. Mitigation conducted on each risk is procuring generators and UPS to anticipate IT system down and the preparation of a Business Continuity Plan to anticipate a labor strike.

References

Alyami, Lee, Yang, Riahi, Bonsall, & Wang. (2014). An advanced risk analysis approach for container port safety evaluation. Maritime Policy & Management,41(7), 634–650.

Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia (2013).

Balfan, Gledhill, & Haubenstock. (2002). Self-assessment of operational risk. RMA Journal, Ocak.

BCM. (2013). BCM Good Practice Guidelines. United Kingdom.

Besner, & Hobbs. (2012). The paradox of risk management; a project management practice perspective. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business,5(2), 230–247.

Chlomoudis, Lampridis, & Pallis. (2013). Quality Assurance: Providing Tools for Managing Risk in Ports. International Journal of Maritime, Trade & Economic Issues (IJMTEI), 1(1), 3–20.

Darmawi. (2000). Manajemen Asuransi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hanstad. (2012). Risk management in major sporting events: A participating national Olympic team’s perspective. Event Management,16(3), 189–201.

Huber, & Scheytt. (2013). The dispositif of risk management: Reconstructing risk management after the financial crisis. Management Accounting Research, 24(2), 88–99.

Najib, Boukachour, & Fazziki. (2013). A Multi Agent Framework for Risk Management in Container Terminal: Suspect Containers Targeting. Targeting. IJCSA,10(2), 33–52.

National Research Council. (1989). Improving Risk Communication. Washington DC.

PWC. (2013). 2013 Risk Management at Port of Tanjung Priok. Jakarta.

Quon, Zeghal, & Maingot. (2012). Enterprise risk management and firm performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,62, 263–267.

Rodrigue. (2010). Maritime Transportation - Drivers for the Shipping and Port Industries. In International Transport Forum. Leipzig, Germany.

Shang, & Tseng. (2010). Shang, K.C. and Tseng, W.J., A risk analysis of stevedoring operations in seaport container terminals. Journal of Marine Science and Technology,18(2), 201– 210.

Sikdar. (2011). Alternate approaches to business impact analysis. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective,20(3), 128–134.

Susilo, & Kaho. (2011). Panduan Manajemen Resiko Berbasis ISO 3100 Industri Non-Perbankan. Jakarta.: Penerbit PPM.

Svata. (2013). System view of business continuity management. Journal of Systems Integration,4(2), 19.

The World Bank. (2013). The World Bank.

Vaughan. (1978). Social change and intergroup preferences in New Zealand. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8(3), 297–314.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-31

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2017): NOVEMBER

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).