Efektivitas dan Efisiensi e-Procurement Pengadaan Barang Konstruksi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54324/jstl.v1i2.1054Keywords:
E-Procurement, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Comparative ResearchAbstract
Purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness and efficiency of PT Metal Bakrie Industries after implementing E-Procurement to its whole procurement activities. To achieve the right and targeted research objectives, the authors formulate a problem regarding whether there are differences in effectiveness and efficiency before and after using E-Procurement at PT Metal Bakrie Industries with effectiveness and efficiency as the independent variable and E-Procurement as the dependent variable. The total population of PT Bakrie Metal Industries staff itself is 38, but only 30 people are taken as samples in this study. The software used by researchers in processing this data is SPSS version 25. This study uses a quantitative approach with data analysis techniques including instrument testing (validity and reliability) and paired t test. Based on the results of this study, after implementing E-Procurement, effectiveness and efficiency were considered better than before implementing E-Procurement. In addition, based on the paired t test, it is said that there is a difference between effectiveness and efficiency before and after using E-Procurement.References
Abdurahmat. Efektivitas Organisasi Edisi Pertama. 7.2008.
Abidin, N. (n.d.). “Optimalisasi Pengembangan E-Procurement pada Sistem Pelelangan Umum Pascakualifikasi dengan Satu Sampul dan Sistem Gugur (Konsep dan D Pengembangan sebagai Fungsi Kontrol) Studi Kasus di Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum.
Adisasmita, R. Pembangunan Kota Optimun, Efisiensi, dan Mandiri. 79.2014.
Adisasmita, R. Pengelolaan Pendapatan dan Anggaran Daerah.2014.
Ambarini, R., Suwandi, R., & Rahardjo, S. (2014). EVALUASI MASA KONSESI PADA PEMBANGUNAN TERMINAL PETIKEMAS KALIBARU EVALUATION CONCESSION DURATION ON KALIBARU CONTAINER TERMINAL. 17, 773–791.
Andrianto, N. Good e-Government: Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Publik Melalui eGovernment. 218.2007.
Fithri, E. J., Ardiani, S., Widyastuti, E., & Farista, R. H. ANALISIS KOMPERATIF EFEKTIFITAS DAN EFISIENSI E-PROCUREMENT DALAM PROSES PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA. 2018.
Gelin Puspitorini, A., Faturrahman, N., Ferdiansyah, A., Firdaus, M. I., & Fernando, R. (2018). Case Study of Milk Run System Improvement in Distributor Company. 729–738.
Lubis. Pengertian dan Karaktwristik Efisiensi. 20.2014.
Lubis. Pengertian Efisiensi.2014.
Lupiyoadi, R. “Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa Teori dan Praktik.” 7.2014.
Othenk. Pengertian Efektivitas dan Landasan Teori Efektivitas. 4.2008.
Puspitasari, Z. N., Wicaksono, F., Agusinta, L., Octaviani, R. D., & Bijaksana, G. (2017). Optimization Green Logistics To Build Efficiency and Environmental Friendly. Advances in Transportation and Logistics Research, 99–102.
Raga, P., Aksa, S. K., Herdian, T., Samosir, F., Nevia, K., & Ponto, A. (2021). Pengukuran Indeks Daya Beli Jasa Transportasi Laut dan Penyeberangan Pada Wilayah Tertinggal. Jurnal Sistem Transportasi & Logistik, 1, 1–6.
Ricardianto, P., Junawan, W., Kania, D. D., Tatiana, Y., Sucipto, Y. D., & Program, D. (2022). The operational effectiveness of national shipyard business operation in cirebon west java indonesia. 2, 77–89.
Sekaran, U. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. 60.2013.
Setyorini, T., Saribanon, E., & Pratiwi, S. W. (2020). an Analysis of the Impacts of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Advances in Transportation and Logistics Research, 3, 607–614.
Siahaya. Manajemen Pengadaan ProcurementManagement. 80.2012.
Siahaya, W. Manajemen Pengadaan. 5.2013.
Steers, M. R. Efektivitas Organisasi.2010.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif,Kualitatif, dan R&D. 7.201
Suryobuwono, A. A., Ruminda, M., Lestari, P., Mahersa, R. P., & Musyaffa, A. Y. (2021). Penentuan Sistem Antrian Kendaraan Untuk Menentukan Efektivitas Jumlah Gardu Pada Gerbang Tol Pt. Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk (Studi Kasus Gerbang Tol Cibubur1). Jurnal Sistem Transportasi & Logistik, 1 (1)(2018), 27–31.
Yurim Zagloel, T., Ardi, R., & Poncotoyo, W. (2018). Six sigma implementation model based on critical success factors (CSFs) for Indonesian small and medium industries. MATEC Web of Conferences, 218. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821804017.
