AIRPORT RAMP RISK ANALYSIS AT HALIM PERDANAKUSUMA

Mustika Sari, Dian Artanti Arubusman, Syaiful Abbas

Abstract


In the last ten years airline industry has grown rapidly and has made airport ramp or apron busier with its activities. The work time in this area is relatively short, causing the work pressure higher than other areas. It is not surprising that accidents and incidents are more potential to happen here. By identifying the hazard and risk, and then doing a risk analysis, the level of risk can be known using a qualitative method referring to the Australian/New Zealand Standard or AS/NZS 4360:2004. It is clear that the highest risks of ramp activities are noise, being struck by operational vehicles, and being squeezed by GSE equipment. Meanwhile, the activities with high risk include fatique, dust, being squeezed by hydraulic during preparation, being scratched by iron, improper body position when putting mannual GSE, being struck down by things, falling down, and getting lavatory water splashed on.


Keywords


risk analysis; work accident; airport ramp area

Full Text:

PDF

References


Australian Standard, Risk Management: 10 November 2011. http://www.schleupen.de/content/schleupen/schleupen013223/A.4.1.4_Australia_and_New_Zealand_Methodology_AS_NZ%25204360_1999.pdf

Australian Transaction Report and Analysis Centre. Risk Management, (2006): A Tool for small-to-medium Sized Business. 6 Oct 2011. http://www.austrac.gov.au/risk_management.html

Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, OHS Answer, (2010): Hazard and Risk. 1 April 2011. http://www.ccohs.ca/ohsanswer/hsprograms/hazard_risk.htm

Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, OHS Answer (2010): Job Safety Analysis. 1 April 2011. http://www.ccohs.c/ohsanswer/hsprograms/job-haz.htm

Cooper, Dominic. 2001. Improving Safety Culture. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Cooper, Dominic. 2002. Safety Culture—A Model for Understanding and Quantifying a Difficult Concept, Professional safety.

Depnaker RI. Himpunan Peraturan Perudang-undangan Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja: Peraturan Menteri Tenaga Kerja Nomor: PER.03/MEN/1998 Tentang Tata Cara Pelaporan dan Pemeriksaan Kecelakaan.

Diberandinis, Louis J. 1999. Handbook of Occupational Safety and Health. NewYork: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Geller, E Scot. 2001. The Psychology of Safety Handbook. America: Lewis Publisher.

International Labour Office, (2008). Report III. ILO Standard on Occupational Safety and Health. Ed.I.Geneva, 26 Nov 2011. www.ilo.org.

International Organization for Standardization. 2008. Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 31000: Risk Management = Princeple and Guidelines on Implementation.

ISO 31000, (2008), Risk Management Standard, Ottawa, 12 Dec 2011, http://www.scribd.com

Kolluru.R.V, et al. 1996. Risk Assesment and Management Handbook, America.

Majid, Suharto A,. & Eko Probo D. Warpani. 2007. Manajemen Operasi Darat Perusahaan Penerbangan (edisi II). Jakarta: STMT Trisakti.

NIOSH. 2007. Ergonomics Guideline to Manual Material Handling. NIOSH: Center for Desease Control and Prevention

OSHA 3071,(2002), Job Hazard Analysis. 20 Dec 2011. http://www.osha.gov

Pranajaya, Dance Dita. 2007. Studi Kasus Budaya Keselamatan pada “L” Emergency Clinic, Thesis Magister Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia, Depok.

Ridley, John. 2001. Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (edisi ketiga). England: Elsevier Ltd..

Winarsunu, Tulus. 2008. Psikologi Keselamatan Kerja. Malang: UMM Press




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.54324/j.mtl.v2i3.111

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 JURNAL MANAJEMEN TRANSPORTASI DAN LOGISTIK

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons Licence

Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik (JMTRANSLOG) is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats